Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only. It is based on publicly available sources and does not constitute legal, professional, or political advice.
Pakistan’s National Assembly has formally passed the 27th Constitutional Amendment, a move that strengthens military authority while adjusting the role of the judiciary. The decision followed a walkout by opposition lawmakers, reflecting deep political divisions over the sweeping reforms.
Background
The 27th Amendment introduces the creation of a Federal Constitutional Court and revises key judicial articles in the Constitution. These changes redefine the appointment process for judges, clarify the powers of the Chief Justice, and adjust the relationship between the Supreme Court and other courts. Supporters argue the amendment enhances governance efficiency and national security, while critics caution that it may compromise judicial independence.
Main Details
- The bill was passed with overwhelming support in the National Assembly, with 234 votes in favor and only four against.
- Members of the opposition party PTI boycotted the vote entirely, while four lawmakers from JUI-F opposed the bill.
- Key modifications include adding the Federal Constitutional Court to Article 6, revising Article 176 regarding the Chief Justice’s term, and adjusting future judicial appointment processes under Article 255.
- Equal representation of provinces in the new court, limitations on presidential immunity, and changes to the Judicial Commission and Supreme Judicial Council were also included.
Impact
This amendment represents a significant shift in Pakistan’s governance. By creating a separate constitutional court and changing judicial appointment procedures, it may centralize power while reducing traditional checks and balances. Advocates see it as a step toward streamlined decision-making, particularly in military and constitutional matters, but observers remain concerned about the long-term impact on democratic governance and judicial independence.
Responses
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif praised the passage of the bill as a demonstration of legislative unity. Meanwhile, opposition lawmakers expressed strong dissent, with some tearing copies of the bill during the session. National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq emphasized dialogue with the opposition, urging discussions to address concerns and maintain parliamentary decorum.
Conclusion
The approval of the 27th Constitutional Amendment marks a historic moment in Pakistan’s legal and political framework. While it establishes new structures for governance and military oversight, the amendment also highlights the ongoing political rifts in the country. The implementation and public response in the coming months will determine its true impact on Pakistan’s democratic institutions.
